Voice evaluation · ASR Model Training
AI Voice Evaluation for ASR Model Training
Human evaluation of your speech models: MOS and preference testing for TTS, WER-in-context review for ASR, and native-speaker judgement on naturalness and intelligibility. Applied to asr model training, the specification is driven by one thing: word error rate overall and per dialect.
- Service
- Voice evaluation
- Use case
- ASR Model Training
- Primary metric
- Word error rate overall and per dialect
Required data profile
- Hundreds to thousands of hours of verbatim-transcribed speech
- Wide speaker diversity: age, gender, region, education, recording condition
- Speaker-disjoint train/dev/test splits
Technical specification
| Parameter | Standard |
|---|---|
| TTS | MOS (1-5), MUSHRA, and A/B preference protocols |
| ASR | Error typing: substitution, deletion, insertion, code-switch failure |
| Panel | Native speakers of the target variety, screened and calibrated |
| Sample size | Powered per the effect size you need to detect |
| Reporting | Per-item scores plus aggregate with confidence intervals |
Process
- Protocol design and sample-size calculation
- Panel recruitment and calibration on reference items
- Blind evaluation with attention checks
- Statistical analysis
- Report with per-error-type breakdown
Metrics this feeds
- Word error rate overall and per dialect
- Entity error rate on names and numbers
- Code-switch token accuracy
Failure modes to design out
- Read-speech-only corpora that do not transfer to spontaneous audio
- Speaker leakage across splits inflating reported accuracy
- Normalised-only transcripts with the raw text discarded
Attention checks and reference anchors are embedded so unreliable raters are detected and excluded before analysis.
Deliverables
- Raw per-rater scores
- Aggregated results with confidence intervals
- Error-type analysis
- Recommended fix priorities
Frequently asked
Is voice evaluation the right service for asr model training?
It covers hundreds to thousands of hours of verbatim-transcribed speech. Most asr model training programmes combine it with at least one other service; we will say so in the scope rather than selling one line item.
What languages are available?
All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands.
How is the evaluation set handled?
Collected first, from speakers disjoint from the training cohort, so improvement is measurable.
Scope voice evaluation for asr model training
Send the metric you need to move.