aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Use case

Indian Language Data for Wake Word Detection

Training and hardening a device wake word against Indian phonetics, background noise and near-miss phrases.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Smart speaker listening for a wake word in an Indian home — Indian Language Data for Wake Word Detection
Primary metric
False accepts per hour
Data shape
Thousands of speakers, few utterances each
Languages
14 + Indian English
01

What the data has to look like

  • Thousands of speakers, few utterances each
  • Positive and hard-negative sets
  • Multiple distances and noise conditions
Wake Word DetectionData profile that moves itWhat it is scored onThousands of speakers, few utterances e…Positive and hard-negative setsMultiple distances and noise conditionsFalse accepts per hourFalse reject rate per accent bandPerformance at 3m and 5mThe corpus is specified backwards from the right-hand column.
02

How the result is measured

  • False accepts per hour
  • False reject rate per accent band
  • Performance at 3m and 5m
Two speakers recording natural conversational speech data — supporting indian language data for wake word detection
Two speakers recording natural conversational speech data
03

Where these projects go wrong

  • Positives only, with no hard negatives
  • Close-mic-only capture
  • No accent-band tagging, so failures cannot be localised

Each of these is a defect that only becomes visible after training, when re-collection costs a release cycle.

04

How we scope it

A wake word detection programme starts from the metric you need to move, not from an hour count. We work backwards: target metric, evaluation set design, then the training volume and speaker spread needed to reach it.

That means the evaluation set is specified and collected first, from speakers who never appear in the training data.

05

The numbers we hold ourselves to

  • 100% of delivered files pass automated technical QA for SNR, clipping, duration and silence
  • 5-25% of files pass a second native-speaker content review, stratified by city, dialect and transcriber, and escalating to 100% on any batch that fails the agreed threshold
  • Accepted yield runs 85-90% for scripted speech, 60-70% for spontaneous, 55-65% for conversational and 50-60% for telephony
  • Default cohort quotas: 50/50 gender, with age bands at 30% (18-25), 40% (26-40) and 30% (41-60)
  • 48 kHz / 24-bit capture, delivered as 16-bit PCM WAV, with studio sessions held below a -50 dBFS noise floor
  • First response within one working day; a scoped, fixed quote within two to three

These are the figures a delivery is measured against, not aspirations. A batch that misses them is re-recorded at our cost rather than repaired.

Frequently asked

How much data does wake word detection need?

It depends on whether you are training from scratch or adapting a base model. Adaptation typically needs a tenth of the volume, but needs tighter matching to your deployment conditions.

Can you build the evaluation set too?

Yes, and it should be collected from disjoint speakers before training data collection finishes, so you can measure improvement rather than memorisation.

Which languages do you support for this?

All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands. Multi-language programmes run to one shared specification so results are comparable.

Scope a wake word detection dataset

Tell us the metric you need to move and the languages in scope.

Request a dataset quote