Hinglish · Devanagari + Latin · hi-Latn-IN
Hinglish AI Training Data Collection
We collect Hinglish speech and language data for AI training across Delhi NCR, Mumbai, Bengaluru and beyond, covering 4 dialect varieties rather than a single prestige standard.

- Speakers
- 350M
- Script
- Devanagari + Latin
- Studio cities
- 7
- Typical programme
- 500-2,000 hours
Why Hinglish breaks generic speech models
Hinglish is not a variant of a language your model already handles. The specific properties below are the ones that show up as errors in production.
- Intra-sentential switching means English words carry Indian phonology, so English acoustic models mis-transcribe them
- Switch points cluster around nouns, numbers, and discourse markers
- Indian English vowel realisations differ systematically from US/UK training data
Dialects we cover
Hinglish has 4 varieties that matter for data collection. Collecting only the standard variety produces a model that works in the capital and fails everywhere else.
- Delhi corporate Hinglish
- Mumbai Bambaiya
- Call-centre register
- Youth/social media register

Code-mixing reality
Hinglish is the code-mixing case itself. Typical urban customer-support speech is 30-60% English tokens embedded in Hindi grammar, with switching several times per utterance.
Specify your expected English-token ratio in the brief. It is cheaper to collect the right mix than to filter the wrong one afterwards.
What is missing from public data
Almost no public corpus contains genuine intra-sentential Hindi-English switching with per-token language tags. This is the highest-value gap for anyone building Indian conversational AI.
This is the practical reason to commission collection rather than assemble open corpora: the gap in the public data is exactly the part your users occupy.
Transcription rules that decide whether the data is usable
These are the Hinglish-specific decisions that go into the style guide before any transcriber starts work.
- Whether English tokens are written in Latin or transliterated into Devanagari must be fixed by rule, not left to annotators
- Language-ID tagging per token is required for training but is skipped by most vendors
- Ambiguous words shared by both languages need an explicit tie-break rule
Recording types available
- Simulated customer-support calls with natural switching
- Two-party spontaneous conversation between colleagues
- Voice-assistant commands with English app and brand names
- Per-token language-tagged transcription
Recommended cohort structure
Recruit by switching behaviour, not by language proficiency. Screening recordings are used to confirm speakers switch naturally rather than performing one language.
| Dimension | Typical split | Why it matters for Hinglish |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 50 / 50 | Pitch range differences change acoustic model behaviour; unbalanced cohorts bias recognition |
| Age | 18-25: 30%, 26-40: 40%, 41-60: 30% | Older speakers retain conservative Hinglish forms that younger urban speakers have lost |
| Region | Delhi NCR / Mumbai / Bengaluru and others | Dialect spread across 4 recognised varieties |
| Education | Mixed, including below-graduate | Prompt-reading fluency correlates with education and skews prosody |
| Condition | Studio / quiet room / field | Match the noise profile of your deployment |
Where we record
Hinglish sessions run in Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Mumbai, Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad. Multi-city fielding is the default because single-city cohorts carry an audible accent signature.
The numbers we hold ourselves to
- 100% of delivered files pass automated technical QA for SNR, clipping, duration and silence
- 5-25% of files pass a second native-speaker content review, stratified by city, dialect and transcriber, and escalating to 100% on any batch that fails the agreed threshold
- Accepted yield runs 85-90% for scripted speech, 60-70% for spontaneous, 55-65% for conversational and 50-60% for telephony
- Default cohort quotas: 50/50 gender, with age bands at 30% (18-25), 40% (26-40) and 30% (41-60)
- 48 kHz / 24-bit capture, delivered as 16-bit PCM WAV, with studio sessions held below a -50 dBFS noise floor
- First response within one working day; a scoped, fixed quote within two to three
These are the figures a delivery is measured against, not aspirations. A batch that misses them is re-recorded at our cost rather than repaired.
Frequently asked
How many Hinglish speakers can you field?
1,000-3,000 speakers for a standard programme, fielded across 7 cities. Recruit by switching behaviour, not by language proficiency. Screening recordings are used to confirm speakers switch naturally rather than performing one language.
Do you transcribe Hinglish in Devanagari + Latin?
Yes, and we can deliver romanised or dual-script transcripts alongside. Whether English tokens are written in Latin or transliterated into Devanagari must be fixed by rule, not left to annotators is one of the rules fixed in the style guide before work begins.
Can you collect dialect-specific Hinglish data?
Yes. Every speaker is tagged with region and dialect, so you can evaluate per variety after delivery instead of discovering the imbalance in production.
What about Hinglish-English code-mixing?
Hinglish is the code-mixing case itself. Typical urban customer-support speech is 30-60% English tokens embedded in Hindi grammar, with switching several times per utterance.
Request a Hinglish dataset quote
Tell us the hours, speaker count and dialect spread you need. You get a scope, a timeline and a price.