aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Voice evaluation · Voice Biometrics

AI Voice Evaluation for Voice Biometrics

Human evaluation of your speech models: MOS and preference testing for TTS, WER-in-context review for ASR, and native-speaker judgement on naturalness and intelligibility. Applied to voice biometrics, the specification is driven by one thing: equal error rate.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Evaluator scoring AI voice output against a rubric — AI Voice Evaluation for Voice Biometrics
Service
Voice evaluation
Use case
Voice Biometrics
Primary metric
Equal error rate
01

Required data profile

  • Many sessions per speaker across days and channels
  • Same-speaker channel variation
  • Optional spoof and replay sets
Voice evaluation — Voice Biometrics · written into the SOW before recordingTTSMOS (1-5), MUSHRA, and A/B preference protocolsASRError typing: substitution, deletion, insertion, code-switc…PanelNative speakers of the target variety, screened and calibra…Sample sizePowered per the effect size you need to detectReportingPer-item scores plus aggregate with confidence intervalsYour values replace ours rather than being converted after delivery.
02

Technical specification

ParameterStandard
TTSMOS (1-5), MUSHRA, and A/B preference protocols
ASRError typing: substitution, deletion, insertion, code-switch failure
PanelNative speakers of the target variety, screened and calibrated
Sample sizePowered per the effect size you need to detect
ReportingPer-item scores plus aggregate with confidence intervals
Data visualisation of studio and field recording coverage across India — supporting ai voice evaluation for voice biometrics
Data visualisation of studio and field recording coverage across India
03

Process

  • Protocol design and sample-size calculation
  • Panel recruitment and calibration on reference items
  • Blind evaluation with attention checks
  • Statistical analysis
  • Report with per-error-type breakdown
04

Metrics this feeds

  • Equal error rate
  • Cross-channel EER
  • Spoof detection rate
05

Failure modes to design out

  • One session per speaker, which makes intra-speaker variability unmodellable
  • No channel variation

Attention checks and reference anchors are embedded so unreliable raters are detected and excluded before analysis.

06

Deliverables

  • Raw per-rater scores
  • Aggregated results with confidence intervals
  • Error-type analysis
  • Recommended fix priorities

Frequently asked

Is voice evaluation the right service for voice biometrics?

It covers many sessions per speaker across days and channels. Most voice biometrics programmes combine it with at least one other service; we will say so in the scope rather than selling one line item.

What languages are available?

All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands.

How is the evaluation set handled?

Collected first, from speakers disjoint from the training cohort, so improvement is measurable.

Scope voice evaluation for voice biometrics

Send the metric you need to move.

Request a dataset quote