aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Voice evaluation · Wake Word Detection

AI Voice Evaluation for Wake Word Detection

Human evaluation of your speech models: MOS and preference testing for TTS, WER-in-context review for ASR, and native-speaker judgement on naturalness and intelligibility. Applied to wake word detection, the specification is driven by one thing: false accepts per hour.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Evaluator scoring AI voice output against a rubric — AI Voice Evaluation for Wake Word Detection
Service
Voice evaluation
Use case
Wake Word Detection
Primary metric
False accepts per hour
01

Required data profile

  • Thousands of speakers, few utterances each
  • Positive and hard-negative sets
  • Multiple distances and noise conditions
Voice evaluation — Wake Word Detection · written into the SOW before recordingTTSMOS (1-5), MUSHRA, and A/B preference protocolsASRError typing: substitution, deletion, insertion, code-switc…PanelNative speakers of the target variety, screened and calibra…Sample sizePowered per the effect size you need to detectReportingPer-item scores plus aggregate with confidence intervalsYour values replace ours rather than being converted after delivery.
02

Technical specification

ParameterStandard
TTSMOS (1-5), MUSHRA, and A/B preference protocols
ASRError typing: substitution, deletion, insertion, code-switch failure
PanelNative speakers of the target variety, screened and calibrated
Sample sizePowered per the effect size you need to detect
ReportingPer-item scores plus aggregate with confidence intervals
Structured dataset packages ready for delivery — supporting ai voice evaluation for wake word detection
Structured dataset packages ready for delivery
03

Process

  • Protocol design and sample-size calculation
  • Panel recruitment and calibration on reference items
  • Blind evaluation with attention checks
  • Statistical analysis
  • Report with per-error-type breakdown
04

Metrics this feeds

  • False accepts per hour
  • False reject rate per accent band
  • Performance at 3m and 5m
05

Failure modes to design out

  • Positives only, with no hard negatives
  • Close-mic-only capture
  • No accent-band tagging, so failures cannot be localised

Attention checks and reference anchors are embedded so unreliable raters are detected and excluded before analysis.

06

Deliverables

  • Raw per-rater scores
  • Aggregated results with confidence intervals
  • Error-type analysis
  • Recommended fix priorities

Frequently asked

Is voice evaluation the right service for wake word detection?

It covers thousands of speakers, few utterances each. Most wake word detection programmes combine it with at least one other service; we will say so in the scope rather than selling one line item.

What languages are available?

All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands.

How is the evaluation set handled?

Collected first, from speakers disjoint from the training cohort, so improvement is measurable.

Scope voice evaluation for wake word detection

Send the metric you need to move.

Request a dataset quote