aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Audio annotation · LLM Evaluation

Audio Annotation for LLM Evaluation

Labelling of existing audio: speaker diarisation, emotion, intent, events, language identification and segment-level quality tagging, against your label schema. Applied to llm evaluation, the specification is driven by one thing: rubric scores with confidence intervals.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Annotator labelling audio segments and speaker turns — Audio Annotation for LLM Evaluation
Service
Audio annotation
Use case
LLM Evaluation
Primary metric
Rubric scores with confidence intervals
01

Required data profile

  • Native-speaker rater panels per language
  • Rubric-based scoring with calibration
  • Overlapping assignments for agreement
Audio annotation — LLM Evaluation · written into the SOW before recordingLabel typesDiarisation, emotion, intent, events, language ID, qualityGranularitySegment, utterance, or frame-level boundariesSchemaYours, or authored with you before work startsAgreementMulti-annotator overlap on a defined percentageToolingClient tooling supported; otherwise our annotation workflowYour values replace ours rather than being converted after delivery.
02

Technical specification

ParameterStandard
Label typesDiarisation, emotion, intent, events, language ID, quality
GranularitySegment, utterance, or frame-level boundaries
SchemaYours, or authored with you before work starts
AgreementMulti-annotator overlap on a defined percentage
ToolingClient tooling supported; otherwise our annotation workflow
Two-speaker conversational recording session in a studio — supporting audio annotation for llm evaluation
Two-speaker conversational recording session in a studio
03

Process

  • Schema definition and edge-case documentation
  • Annotator training and gold-set calibration
  • Production annotation with gold items seeded in
  • Adjudication of disagreements by a senior reviewer
  • Delivery with per-label agreement statistics
04

Metrics this feeds

  • Rubric scores with confidence intervals
  • Inter-rater agreement
  • Failure-mode distribution
05

Failure modes to design out

  • Raters who are fluent but not native in the variety
  • Rubrics written in English and applied to non-English output without localisation

Gold items are seeded throughout production so drift is caught during the run, not at delivery.

06

Deliverables

  • Labelled data in your schema
  • Gold set and calibration results
  • Per-label agreement statistics
  • Edge-case log

Frequently asked

Is audio annotation the right service for llm evaluation?

It covers native-speaker rater panels per language. Most llm evaluation programmes combine it with at least one other service; we will say so in the scope rather than selling one line item.

What languages are available?

All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands.

How is the evaluation set handled?

Collected first, from speakers disjoint from the training cohort, so improvement is measurable.

Scope audio annotation for llm evaluation

Send the metric you need to move.

Request a dataset quote