2,000 speakers of Malayalam Telephony Speech

Speech captured over a real telephony path — a genuine call through the network, not studio audio downsampled afterwards to imitate one.

Scenario-driven calls between a caller and an agent or IVR flow, each leg recorded separately, across a deliberate spread of handsets and network conditions.

Yield at this style: 50–60% of recorded time is accepted. Dropped calls, network artefacts beyond tolerance and unusable legs are discarded. Real network conditions are the point of the style and also its main cost.

• Call scenarios drawn from real contact-centre intents: balance enquiry, complaint, booking change, escalation
• IVR flows scripted with deliberate mis-entry and barge-in paths, since those are where deployed systems fail
• Handset spread specified up front — low-end Android, feature phone, landline — because handset variance is a real acoustic axis
• Background conditions varied on purpose: street, vehicle, indoor, since real callers are rarely in quiet rooms
• Built against Malayalam specifically: One of the most consonant-dense Indian languages; long geminates and clusters raise word error rates sharply
• Code-mixing handled explicitly rather than edited out — Manglish is standard in urban and professional speech, with heavy English noun and verb insertion.

Sixteen to twenty-two weeks, run in waves so that recruitment in the harder catchments starts early rather than being left to the end.

Ten to twelve batches with rolling demographic reconciliation, since a quota gap discovered in week eighteen is very expensive to close.

Budget higher transcription effort per audio hour for Malayalam than for Hindi; speech rate and morphology make it slower to annotate.

At 2,000 speakers the quota matrix is enforced per cell, not in aggregate. Every dialect, age and gender combination carries its own target and is signed off individually before final acceptance, because an aggregate 50/50 split can hide a cell that was never filled at all.

Recruitment must be stratified by handset and carrier as well as by dialect, which adds a screening axis the other styles do not have.

• One of the most consonant-dense Indian languages; long geminates and clusters raise word error rates sharply
• Manglish is standard in urban and professional speech, with heavy English noun and verb insertion.
• Central Kerala news-reading dominates public data. Malabar and southern varieties, and fast conversational speech generally, are missing.

• Codec and sample rate verified per file, rejecting any studio audio that has been downsampled to fake a telephony path
• Echo and double-talk checked on both legs
• DTMF events verified against the call log
• Level normalisation applied per leg, since handset output levels vary far more than studio microphones do
• Old vs new script (chillu characters, Unicode normalisation) mixed within a dataset
• Fast speech leads to dropped-word transcription errors without a second-pass QA

100% technical QA, 7% content QA stratified across every axis, blind re-transcription audit, and per-cell demographic sign-off before final acceptance.

• Studio audio downsampled to 8 kHz and passed off as telephony, which has none of the codec or packet-loss characteristics that matter
• Echo and double-talk that make the agent leg unusable
• Carrier and handset monoculture, producing a corpus that only represents one acoustic path
• Over-clean recordings from participants who move somewhere quiet to take the call, defeating the purpose

Cost at this band is driven by: Long-tail demographic cells, which dominate both cost and schedule at this size.

• The final 15% of the cohort — the rarest demographic cells — routinely takes as long as the first half and should be scheduled first, not last
• Speaker pool exhaustion is a hard constraint in all but the largest languages
• Voice-based duplicate detection across 2,000 speakers is a genuine engineering task, not a spreadsheet check
• Malayalam carries 5 recognised varieties across Kerala, Lakshadweep, Puducherry (Mahe), so the quota matrix is wider than the headline volume suggests
• Central Kerala news-reading dominates public data. Malabar and southern varieties, and fast conversational speech generally, are missing.

• WAV audio to your naming convention, with the per-file manifest
• Verbatim Malayalam transcripts with utterance-level timestamps
• Call metadata: duration, codec, handset class, carrier, packet-loss events
• Intent label per call and per turn
• DTMF and hold, transfer and barge-in events
• Agent and caller leg identifiers
• Per-speaker metadata: age band, gender, region, dialect, education band
• Consent records mapped to speaker IDs
• QA report with pass rates, rejection reasons and agreement statistics
• Speaker-disjoint train / dev / test splits on request

• Contact-centre and IVR ASR
• Voice bots operating over the phone network
• Intent classification on narrowband audio
• Robustness to codec and packet loss

Narrowband telephony audio is the wrong input for TTS or any wideband model — the frequency content simply is not there. Use it for models that will be deployed on a phone line and nothing else.