50 hours of Gujarati Scripted Speech

Speakers read prompts from a phonetically balanced script shown one line at a time, with retakes on any flubbed or misread line.

A 45-minute booth session yields roughly 300–400 prompts. One file per utterance, cut at the prompt boundary, so alignment is exact before any forced-alignment pass runs.

Yield at this style: 85–90% of recorded time is accepted. Prompt-level retakes catch problems inside the session, so very little is discarded afterwards. This is the highest-yield style we run.

• Script built for triphone coverage rather than word coverage, so rare phone contexts appear often enough to train on
• Digit strings, dates, currency and person names blocked separately, because these are where deployed ASR actually fails
• Domain lexicon injected from your product vocabulary when you supply one
• Sentence-length distribution spread deliberately, since all-short prompts produce a model that cannot handle long utterances
• Built against Gujarati specifically: Murmured (breathy-voiced) vowels are phonemic in Gujarati and are absent from most shared Indic acoustic models
• Code-mixing handled explicitly rather than edited out — Business and trade vocabulary is heavily English; Gujarati diaspora speech adds further English structure. Specify whether diaspora speakers are in or out of scope.

Three to four weeks from signed specification. Recruitment is the critical path, not recording — the studio time itself is under two weeks.

Two batches: a 10-hour first batch in week two so you can run it through your pipeline while the rest is still recording, then the balance on completion.

Surat and Rajkot recruitment is essential for dialect coverage; Ahmedabad-only cohorts sound uniform.

At 50 hours the cohort is deliberately simplified: two or three dialect groups rather than the full spread, with quotas enforced in aggregate. A build this size cannot support per-cell targets and should not claim to.

Requires literate speakers comfortable reading aloud in the target script, which is the main constraint on cohort breadth and has to be actively counterweighted.

• Murmured (breathy-voiced) vowels are phonemic in Gujarati and are absent from most shared Indic acoustic models
• Business and trade vocabulary is heavily English; Gujarati diaspora speech adds further English structure. Specify whether diaspora speakers are in or out of scope.
• Very little spontaneous Gujarati audio exists publicly; nearly all of it is Ahmedabad read speech.

• Prompt-to-audio match verified by a native reviewer; a misread line is a rejected file, not an edited transcript
• Hyperarticulation flagged — a speaker over-enunciating because they are reading produces audio that does not match deployment
• Clipping and truncation checked at both utterance boundaries
• Per-speaker prompt coverage confirmed, so no speaker silently skips a block
• Breathy vowels have no consistent orthographic marking
• Kathiyawadi lexical items replaced with standard equivalents

100% content QA. At this volume there is no reason to sample, and a pilot exists precisely to surface specification problems.

• Reading voice: flat prosody and unnatural stress that trains a model on speech nobody actually produces
• Prompt fatigue in the back half of long sessions, where accuracy drops and pace flattens
• Speakers who are not fluent readers, which quietly biases the cohort toward higher education bands
• Script leakage across speakers, producing a corpus that memorises sentences instead of covering sounds

Cost at this band is driven by: Fixed setup cost is amortised over very few hours, so the per-hour rate is at its highest here; Narrow demographic requirements bite hardest at small cohort sizes.

• The specification itself is usually the risk, not delivery — pilots exist to find the clauses that do not survive contact with real speakers
• A single-city cohort will not represent the language nationally, and reading pilot results as national is the most common mistake at this band
• Gujarati carries 5 recognised varieties across Gujarat, Daman & Diu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, so the quota matrix is wider than the headline volume suggests
• Very little spontaneous Gujarati audio exists publicly; nearly all of it is Ahmedabad read speech.

• WAV audio to your naming convention, with the per-file manifest
• Verbatim Gujarati transcripts with utterance-level timestamps
• Prompt ID mapped to every utterance
• Verbatim deviation flags where the speaker departed from the script
• Per-utterance SNR and duration in the manifest
• Per-speaker metadata: age band, gender, region, dialect, education band
• Consent records mapped to speaker IDs
• QA report with pass rates, rejection reasons and agreement statistics
• Speaker-disjoint train / dev / test splits on request

• ASR acoustic model baselines
• TTS voice building where a single speaker is recorded at depth
• Pronunciation lexicon and G2P validation
• Forced-alignment and phone-boundary work

Scripted audio contains no disfluencies, no false starts and no natural turn-taking. A model trained on it alone degrades sharply on real spontaneous input, so it is a baseline layer rather than a complete training set.