aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Voice Assistant Companies · Wake Word Detection

Wake Word Detection Data for Voice Assistant Companies

Device, OS and appliance makers shipping assistants into Indian homes and vehicles, where wake-word reliability and far-field accuracy decide the review scores. Training and hardening a device wake word against Indian phonetics, background noise and near-miss phrases.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Smart speaker listening for a wake word in an Indian home — Wake Word Detection Data for Voice Assistant Companies
Buyer
Voice Assistant Companies
Use case
Wake Word Detection
Metric
False accepts per hour
01

Where the two meet

Wake-word false accepts and rejects spike on Indian phonetics That is a wake word detection problem, and it is solved by data shaped like this:

  • Thousands of speakers, few utterances each
  • Positive and hard-negative sets
  • Multiple distances and noise conditions
Voice Assistant Companies · Wake Word DetectionWhat goes wrongWhat they check before signingWake-word false accepts and rejects spike… on Indian phonetics…Far-field and in-car conditions are not r…epresented in close-mic corpora…Indian names, places, brands and numbers …are the most common entity failures…Can recordings be captured at the distanc…es and conditions the device sees?…Are entity-heavy prompt sets available (n…ames, addresses, PIN codes, amounts)?…Can negative wake-word data be collected …alongside positives?…We quote against the right-hand column, not the pitch.
02

Your evaluation criteria

  • Can recordings be captured at the distances and conditions the device sees?
  • Are entity-heavy prompt sets available (names, addresses, PIN codes, amounts)?
  • Can negative wake-word data be collected alongside positives?
Annotators writing prompts and responses for LLM training data — supporting wake word detection data for voice assistant companies
Annotators writing prompts and responses for LLM training data
03

Metrics

  • False accepts per hour
  • False reject rate per accent band
  • Performance at 3m and 5m
04

Pitfalls

  • Positives only, with no hard negatives
  • Close-mic-only capture
  • No accent-band tagging, so failures cannot be localised
05

Contract points

  • Device-specific recording conditions
  • Exclusive use of the collected wake-word data
  • Staged delivery per firmware milestone

Frequently asked

What does a first engagement look like?

Usually a scoped pilot: one language, an evaluation set plus a first training batch, delivered in three to five weeks, followed by the full programme.

Can you match our existing vendor's schema?

Yes. Working to your schema avoids a conversion pass and keeps deliveries comparable across vendors.

How is provenance documented?

Per-item contributor records and consent mapped to IDs in the manifest.

Send your requirement

Language, volume, metric, deadline.

Request a dataset quote