aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Multilingual collection · LLM Evaluation

Multilingual Data Collection for LLM Evaluation

Parallel programmes across several Indian languages at once, run to one specification so the resulting datasets are comparable rather than a set of incompatible deliveries. Applied to llm evaluation, the specification is driven by one thing: rubric scores with confidence intervals.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Evaluator scoring AI voice output against a rubric — Multilingual Data Collection for LLM Evaluation
Service
Multilingual collection
Use case
LLM Evaluation
Primary metric
Rubric scores with confidence intervals
01

Required data profile

  • Native-speaker rater panels per language
  • Rubric-based scoring with calibration
  • Overlapping assignments for agreement
Multilingual collection — LLM Evaluation · written into the SOW before recordingLanguagesUp to 14 Indian languages plus Indian English in one progra…ConsistencyOne spec, one manifest schema, one QA standard across all l…BalancePer-language quotas set independently to match your deploym…ReportingSingle consolidated progress view across languagesYour values replace ours rather than being converted after delivery.
02

Technical specification

ParameterStandard
LanguagesUp to 14 Indian languages plus Indian English in one programme
ConsistencyOne spec, one manifest schema, one QA standard across all languages
BalancePer-language quotas set independently to match your deployment mix
ReportingSingle consolidated progress view across languages
Speaker reading a prompt script into a studio microphone — supporting multilingual data collection for llm evaluation
Speaker reading a prompt script into a studio microphone
03

Process

  • Master specification written once and localised per language
  • Per-language linguistic review of prompts and guides
  • Parallel fielding across studio cities
  • Central QA applying identical thresholds
  • Consolidated delivery with per-language reports
04

Metrics this feeds

  • Rubric scores with confidence intervals
  • Inter-rater agreement
  • Failure-mode distribution
05

Failure modes to design out

  • Raters who are fluent but not native in the variety
  • Rubrics written in English and applied to non-English output without localisation

The hardest language sets the timeline. Low-resource languages such as Assamese and Odia should start first.

06

Deliverables

  • Per-language datasets in one schema
  • Cross-language coverage report
  • Consolidated QA summary

Frequently asked

Is multilingual collection the right service for llm evaluation?

It covers native-speaker rater panels per language. Most llm evaluation programmes combine it with at least one other service; we will say so in the scope rather than selling one line item.

What languages are available?

All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands.

How is the evaluation set handled?

Collected first, from speakers disjoint from the training cohort, so improvement is measurable.

Scope multilingual collection for llm evaluation

Send the metric you need to move.

Request a dataset quote