aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

Translation · LLM Evaluation

Translation & Localisation Data for LLM Evaluation

Human translation and parallel-corpus creation across Indian languages, built for machine-translation training and multilingual LLM evaluation rather than for publication. Applied to llm evaluation, the specification is driven by one thing: rubric scores with confidence intervals.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Abstract visualisation of translation between two Indian languages — Translation & Localisation Data for LLM Evaluation
Service
Translation
Use case
LLM Evaluation
Primary metric
Rubric scores with confidence intervals
01

Required data profile

  • Native-speaker rater panels per language
  • Rubric-based scoring with calibration
  • Overlapping assignments for agreement
Translation — LLM Evaluation · written into the SOW before recordingDirectionEnglish to Indian languages and between Indian languagesOutputSentence-aligned parallel corporaRegisterFormal, colloquial, or matched to your product toneReviewIndependent bilingual review passTerminologyClient glossary enforced and returned updatedYour values replace ours rather than being converted after delivery.
02

Technical specification

ParameterStandard
DirectionEnglish to Indian languages and between Indian languages
OutputSentence-aligned parallel corpora
RegisterFormal, colloquial, or matched to your product tone
ReviewIndependent bilingual review pass
TerminologyClient glossary enforced and returned updated
Two-speaker conversational recording session in a studio — supporting translation & localisation data for llm evaluation
Two-speaker conversational recording session in a studio
03

Process

  • Glossary and register agreement
  • Translation by native speakers of the target language
  • Independent bilingual review
  • Alignment verification
  • Delivery with terminology report
04

Metrics this feeds

  • Rubric scores with confidence intervals
  • Inter-rater agreement
  • Failure-mode distribution
05

Failure modes to design out

  • Raters who are fluent but not native in the variety
  • Rubrics written in English and applied to non-English output without localisation

Back-translation checks are run on a sample so you can see where source ambiguity, not translator error, causes divergence.

06

Deliverables

  • Sentence-aligned parallel data
  • Updated glossary
  • Reviewer notes on ambiguous source

Frequently asked

Is translation the right service for llm evaluation?

It covers native-speaker rater panels per language. Most llm evaluation programmes combine it with at least one other service; we will say so in the scope rather than selling one line item.

What languages are available?

All 14 languages in the network plus Indian English accent bands.

How is the evaluation set handled?

Collected first, from speakers disjoint from the training cohort, so improvement is measurable.

Scope translation for llm evaluation

Send the metric you need to move.

Request a dataset quote