aidataservices.inAI data collection · India

LLM human data · اردو

Urdu Human Data for LLM Projects

Human-generated text and speech for LLM training and evaluation in Indian languages: prompts, preference rankings, instruction-response pairs, red-teaming and cultural-fit review. This page covers how that works specifically for Urdu, where shares most phonology with hindi but adds perso-arabic phonemes (/q/, /x/, /ɣ/, /z/, /f/) that many speakers merge.

Request a dataset quoteReply within one working day
Annotators writing prompts and responses for LLM training data — Urdu Human Data for LLM Projects
Language
Urdu (ur-IN)
Dialects covered
5
Typical programme
250-1,000 hours
Cities
Hyderabad, Lucknow, Delhi
01

What changes when the language is Urdu

The service specification stays constant across languages; the linguistics do not. For Urdu, three things drive the design of a llm human data programme.

  • Shares most phonology with Hindi but adds Perso-Arabic phonemes (/q/, /x/, /ɣ/, /z/, /f/) that many speakers merge
  • Dialect spread: Dakhini (Hyderabad), Lucknawi, Dehlvi, Bihari Urdu
  • Spoken Urdu and spoken Hindi are largely mutually intelligible; the distinction is mainly lexical and orthographic. Decide up front whether transcription is in Nastaliq, Devanagari, or both.
LLM human data — Urdu · written into the SOW before recordingTask typesPrompt writing, response ranking, instruction-response pair…LanguagesAny language in the network, including code-mixed HinglishContributorsScreened by domain, education band and language proficiencyAgreementOverlapping assignments with adjudicationProvenancePer-item contributor and time recordsYour values replace ours rather than being converted after delivery.
02

Technical specification

ParameterStandard
Task typesPrompt writing, response ranking, instruction-response pairs, adversarial testing
LanguagesAny language in the network, including code-mixed Hinglish
ContributorsScreened by domain, education band and language proficiency
AgreementOverlapping assignments with adjudication
ProvenancePer-item contributor and time records
Two speakers recording natural conversational speech data — supporting urdu human data for llm projects
Two speakers recording natural conversational speech data
03

Urdu cohort design

Fix the script decision before fielding; retro-transcribing a Nastaliq dataset into Devanagari after delivery costs as much as the original transcription pass.

DimensionTypical splitWhy it matters for Urdu
Gender50 / 50Pitch range differences change acoustic model behaviour; unbalanced cohorts bias recognition
Age18-25: 30%, 26-40: 40%, 41-60: 30%Older speakers retain conservative Urdu forms that younger urban speakers have lost
RegionUttar Pradesh / Telangana / Bihar and othersDialect spread across 5 recognised varieties
EducationMixed, including below-graduatePrompt-reading fluency correlates with education and skews prosody
ConditionStudio / quiet room / fieldMatch the noise profile of your deployment
04

Process

  • Task specification and rubric design
  • Contributor screening against the rubric
  • Calibration round with feedback
  • Production with overlap and gold items
  • Adjudication and delivery
05

Urdu-specific quality rules

  • Right-to-left Nastaliq tooling errors and diacritic loss
  • Merged phonemes transcribed by sound rather than by etymology, or vice versa, inconsistently
  • Dakhini forms replaced with standard Urdu

Every item is traceable to a screened contributor, which matters when a model vendor audits your data provenance.

06

Deliverables

  • Task data in your schema
  • Rubric and calibration results
  • Contributor metadata (anonymised)
  • Agreement statistics
07

Worked example

A representative Urdu llm human data engagement: 250 hours from 500 speakers, 50/50 gender, ages 18-45, spread across Hyderabad, Lucknow, Delhi, recorded to the specification above and delivered in WAV with a per-utterance manifest.

Timeline: 2-6 weeks depending on task complexity and contributor screening depth.

08

Where this data is missing today

Indian Urdu specifically, and Dakhini in particular, are absent from public data dominated by Pakistani Urdu broadcast speech.

Frequently asked

How much does Urdu llm human data cost?

Priced per delivered hour or unit against a written spec. The cost drivers for Urdu are dialect spread, demographic narrowness and recording condition, in that order.

Which Urdu dialects are included?

By default Dakhini (Hyderabad), Lucknawi, Dehlvi, Bihari Urdu and others, tagged per speaker. You can also commission a single-dialect corpus if you are targeting one region.

Can you deliver Urdu data in our format?

Yes. Task data in your schema is the default, but naming, schema and directory structure follow your pipeline.

How long does a Urdu programme take?

2-6 weeks depending on task complexity and contributor screening depth.

Request a Urdu llm human data quote

Hours, speakers, dialects, deadline. Send what you have.

Request a dataset quote